|
Evidence-based conservation is the application of evidence in conservation management actions and policy making. It is defined as systematically assessing scientific information from published, peer-reviewed publications and texts, practitioners' experiences, independent expert assessment, and local and indigenous knowledge on a specific conservation topic. This includes assessing the current effectiveness of different management interventions, threats and emerging problems and economic factors.〔 (【引用サイトリンク】publisher=Conservation Evidence ) 〕 Evidence-based conservation was organized based on the observations that decision making in conservation was based on intuition and/ or practitioner experience often disregarding other forms of evidence of successes and failures (e.g. scientific information). This has led to costly and poor outcomes. Evidence-based conservation provides access to information that will support decision making through an evidence-based framework of “what works” in conservation Evidence based approach to conservation is based on evidence-based practice which started in medicine and later spread to nursing, education, psychology and other fields. Evidence for evidence based conservation is broadly produced and published in three forms: systematic reviews, synopsis and summaries. ==Systematic review== A systematic review consists of a non-subjective assessment of available data and evidence related to a management. Synthesizing results from different studies over different time periods, locations or sample sizes can reduce the bias present in individual studies. Systematic reviews differ from traditional reviews by being easily understood, peer reviewed and repeatable. Detailed protocols remain available for conducting a thorough, unbiased systematic review.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Evidence-based conservation」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|